Liberty

Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  |  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search


May 2003
Volume 17,
Number 5

R.W. Bradford examines contemporary terrorists and their interrogators.

  Gulf War II  

Disconnect

by Bruce Ramsey


The feeling of being isolated, not personally but politically, began for me Sept. 11, 2001, and has grown worse. I had supported George W. Bush, even argued for him in these pages, and held out some hope for his time in power. By late summer 2001 he had just pushed through his cut in income and inheritance taxes, and had continued to support individual accounts within Social Security. I liked that.

Bruce Ramsey is a journalist in Seattle.

On Sept. 11 it was as if someone had gone down into the cellar, retrieved an old war movie, and said, "Attention everybody. Now we're gonna watch this." Pundits noted how George W. Bush was so presidential. Well, he was. He knew what to do.

So did the conservatives. I still shake my head at how the conservatives — not the stupid ones, but the smart ones — joined the parade at the first flag unfurling. They had no doubts about a War on Terror. A police action against al Qaeda I could understand. But a War on Terror? A war on militant Islam? A war to politically reconstruct the Middle East? What the hell?

The conservatives marched away. Their radio talk shows, to which I tuned regularly, are now war, war, war, all the time, and a disgusting mockery of the French as "cheese-eating surrender monkeys."

The left is saying what I am saying if you stop at the first slogan, "No Iraq War." I have one of those signs in my window. But I am not one of them. Never have been.

I focus in and out of the news in a dispirited way. It is daily minutiae of a dull game — votes in the Security Council, what the French said, whether Saddam has violated U.N. resolution something-or-other, what Hans Blix said, blah blah blah. Everything the inspectors find is a reason for war and everything they don't find is a reason for war. There is no focus on essential questions.

Recently I saw a story about the missiles that Iraq had not given up. The TV showed several of these white-finned cylinders, perhaps two feet in diameter, stacked on the back of a truck. No mention of the range. Three newspaper accounts later, I found their suspected range, 93 miles.

Iraq has missiles that go 93 miles. Well.

Then there is all the talk of "weapons of mass destruction." The announcers no longer say what sort of weapons those are, but I remember they are chemical, biological, and nuclear, and I am cynical about why such radically dissimilar things are put in a common category, and given that particular name. I am skeptical of whether any of them is a threat to me.

I listen to my president and he says he must disarm Iraq to protect the United States. I don't believe him. I didn't believe everything my government said before, but I did, in fact, believe many things it said. Now I find that some of the things Saddam Hussein's government says actually make more sense, and that is not a comforting thought.

I see American troops, young and robust, eating their pouches of hot jambalaya. They are my country's soldiers. I don't want them killed. And yet I don't yearn for their triumphal entry into Baghdad because I don't want them to be in Baghdad. I think of the taking of Seoul by the Marines in 1950, half a century ago, and that American troops are still in Korea, and that their being there is part of a whole other problem that I might be thinking about.

I think of a cold beer.

© Copyright 2008, Liberty Foundation


Send editorial comments to letters@libertyunbound.com.
All letters to the editor are assumed to be for publication unless otherwise indicated.

Send web site comments to webmaster@libertyunbound.com.


Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search