Liberty

Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  |  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search


June 2003
Volume 17,
Number 6

Ralph R. Reiland watches the Supreme Court debate Texan sodomy.

  Analysis  

Michiganistan?

by Leon Drolet

Only a handful of places impose harsh sentences on homosexuals: Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Iran, Afghanistan, Singapore, Malaysia, Yemen, Mauritania, Sudan . . . and Michigan?


What do Michigan and Idaho have in common with Islamic theocracies like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran? They share the most Draconian penalties in the world for engaging in adult, private, consensual, non-commercial sexual acts.

Leon Drolet is a Michigan state representative.

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide on the constitutionality of state sodomy laws and, as a Michigan state legislator, I support repeal of this state's laws. Violators of Michigan's felony law can be penalized with 15 years of imprisonment and can even be sentenced to five years for engaging in oral sex. Michigan's sodomy laws apply to heterosexuals and homosexuals (and everyone in between), married or unmarried, and cover a wide and vaguely defined range of private, adult, consensual, non-commercial sexual activities.

While doing research on Michigan's sodomy law, I examined sodomy laws worldwide. I took a world map and colored black the U.S. states and foreign countries with penalties as strict or stricter than Michigan's. Countries and states with no such laws, I left uncolored. The results should be disconcerting to anyone who cherishes the United States as the standard bearer of freedom throughout the world: two U.S. states stand with a handful of Islamic theocracies centered around the Middle East whose names mostly ended with "stan." These "stans" and some other Muslim nations are joined by several North African nations, one South American nation (Guyana), and a few places in Asia (Malaysia, Nepal, Mauritania, the Maldives, and Singapore). Only one modern democracy outside the U.S. makes the list: India, whose maximum penalty of life imprisonment is matched by Idaho. In all, there are 18 black-colored countries and one U.S. state with sodomy penalties stricter than Michigan's.

The uncolored states and countries, those with no sodomy laws, dominate the map. No European country has sodomy laws. Neither do Canada, Mexico, Central America, and 37 of the American states, nor do Russia, China, Japan, and the vast majority of Asian states, nor any place in South America (save Guyana) have any laws that punish consenting adults, in the privacy of their homes, for making love as they choose. I colored gray 13 states and several dozen countries (again centered disproportionately in Islamic regions) because they have lesser sodomy penalties, ranging from minor fines to less than 15 years imprisonment.

sodomy map

To be fair, U.S. states rarely enforce their sodomy laws while the same is not true in some Middle Eastern countries. Amnesty International estimates that as many as 4,000 homosexual men have been decapitated by the Iranian government since that nation's 1979 Islamic revolution. In 2000, Saudi Arabia beheaded three men convicted of sodomy, and nine others were sentenced to more than 2,500 lashes and five years imprisonment.1 The penalty in Afghanistan after the fall of the Taliban government is uncertain, but before the regime change the penalty for homosexual sex was to place the offender next to a stone wall and push it on top of him with a tank or bulldozer. Whether the offender lived or died was considered to be the judgment of Allah.

Violators of Michigan's felony law can be penalized with 15 years of imprisonment and can even be sentenced to five years for engaging in oral sex.

As the two Texans who now find their case before the Supreme Court discovered, U.S. states sometimes do prosecute for sodomy. Currently in Michigan, more heterosexuals are charged with this victimless crime than are homosexuals. Why? Because those convicted of sodomy do not have their names placed on the state's public sex offender registry. Those charged with crimes like sexual assault can plead down to attempted sodomy to avoid the humiliation of having neighbors see their names posted on the Internet.

Why do some U.S. states join Islamic theocracies in having draconian laws against private, adult, consensual sex acts? Why do so few countries with Christian populations have such laws? The answer lies with the origins of each faith — the very teachings of Jesus and Mohammed.

Jesus the Secularist

Jesus wasn't interested in tax policy. When he uttered those oft-quoted words, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and render unto God that which is God's" (Matthew 22:21), he said something unprecedented in antiquity. Until the modern era in Western civilization, the distinction between secular and religious powers was unknown. Rulers were considered either to be gods themselves, like the pharaohs of ancient Egypt, or ordained by gods to rule in their stead. The laws of the state were the will of the gods. When Jesus told the Pharisees to separate that belonging to God from that belonging to the state, he introduced for the first time the concept of a separation of the interests of religion and government.

Jesus reaffirmed this separation when the Pharisees brought before him the woman caught in the act of adultery. Before the crowd to which he was preaching, the Pharisees asked Jesus whether the penalty for adultery (death by stoning) should be enforced. His famous reply, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," resulted in the quiet dispersal of the Pharisees and the crowd. Left alone with the accused woman, Jesus asked her, "Woman, does no man condemn thee?" The woman replied, "None, Lord." Jesus then ignored the punishment prescribed for adulterers by Jewish law saying, "Neither do I condemn thee. Go, and sin no more."(John 8:7)

Jesus separated the ancient covenant of Moses and the Old Testament from the teachings of the New Testament. He commanded the woman to sin no more. He didn't say she should be stoned if she sinned again, nor did he tell the Pharisees to turn the woman over to Roman authorities for punishment by the state. Her individual relationship with God was different and far more important to Jesus than her status according to the laws of the state. What would Jesus have done if the Pharisees had brought before him a man caught "lying with a man as with a woman" (Leviticus 18:22), another Old Testament offense punishable by stoning? If he were alive today, would Jesus file a brief with the courts in favor of keeping state sodomy laws?

In Michigan, more heterosexuals are charged with this victimless crime than are homosexuals.

Many Christians today are hostile to the suggestion that Jesus distinguished between the interests of government and those of God because "separation of church and state" is so frequently abused by non-Christians to oppose any acknowledgement of God. But the New Testament is consistent in teaching Christian values without prescribing Leviticus-style government enforcement of those values. Stephen Legate explains Jesus' consistent support for free will over coercion in his excellent essay, "The Call of Christ to Freedom" (April). I highly recommend his essay to Christians of the Left who support using government to enforce virtue, as well as to Christians of the Right who believe government force should be used to punish victimless crimes.

After Jesus' death at the hands of government authorities and after hundreds of years of cruel persecution by Rome, Christians won the reins of state power. They quickly ignored Jesus' teachings about the role of religion and the role of the state. Christian Roman emperors forced non-believers to convert or die. Later, Christian monarchs deemed themselves anointed by God, and many (though select) biblical teachings became government laws. It took 1,700 years of wars, inquisitions, and reformations for the Christian world to discover that Christianity is not dependent upon the state, nor is it diminished by its separation from the coercive power of the state. In modern Western democracies, most Christians have come to agree with Jesus that some things belong under God's jurisdiction and others under Caesar's.

The Office of the Night

Early Christian societies were sometimes tolerant of private sexual activities, but that tolerance decreased through the Middle Ages. Harsh persecution of those who committed "vile sins against nature" became the norm throughout Europe by around 1300.2 Not until the Renaissance did attitudes begin to swing back toward tolerance of some private sexual activities outside marriage.

By the 1400s, Florence, Italy was the epicenter of the Renaissance, and had developed a reputation within Europe for being permissive toward homosexual conduct. In 1432 under pressure from the Church, the city government created a special panel to investigate and jail sodomy law violators. The special panel was called the Office of the Night (OTN).

According to research by Michael Rocke of the Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies in Florence, the OTN was very busy. Over its 70 years of existence, the OTN brought sodomy charges against thousands of men in a city of only 40,000. According to Rocke, fewer than 3,000 of those charged were actually convicted.3

In 1476 Leonardo da Vinci was twice anonymously denounced to the OTN for alleged acts of sodomy, once with 17-year-old model, or prostitute, Jacapo Saltarelli. Leonardo, then 24 years old, was held in confinement for two months but was acquitted due to lack of witnesses.4

Florentines periodically resisted the OTN. In the nearby town of Prato, the box where citizens were supposed to place sodomy accusations was frequently torn down. It appears that the OTN resisted when pressured too hard by Church authorities, once refusing to convict anyone for 14 months. During the rule of Lorenzo de' Medici (1469–1492), the OTN became considerably more lenient toward sodomy.

When Jesus told the Pharisees to separate that belonging to God from that belonging to the state, he introduced for the first time the concept of a separation of the interests of religion and government.

Frustration with OTN lenience peaked in 1494 with the overthrow of the Medici family by followers of the moralistic Dominican friar, Girolamo Savonarola, who called on Florentines to "burn the sodomites!" But Savonarola's reign was short-lived. In 1497, Florentines rebelled against his harsh rule and the severe penalties it inspired, and staged a riot. Over the next year, Savonarola, a vocal critic of the pope, was excommunicated, charged with heresy, tortured, hanged, and his corpse burned. The OTN continued to exist for a few more years, though the prosecution of sodomy was largely taken over by others. Florentines began perceiving the very existence of an "office of the sodomites" as a stain on their honor, and on December 29, 1502, the Office of the Night was finally closed.

On August 31, 1512, a band of 30 young aristocrats charged city hall and demanded that the council rescind the sentences of all who had been exiled or deprived of office for sodomy. Rebuffed, these young revolutionaries helped Lorenzo the Magnificent's son, Giuliano de' Medici, overthrow the republic two weeks later. The Medici family agreed to release those convicted of sodomy, and toleration was restored.5

The Age of Reason

By the time of the Age of Reason in the 18th century, most European governments had dramatically scaled back their medieval laws that punished those who engaged in certain kinds of private, consensual sexual activity. Dramatic changes in the way Europeans viewed religion, the state, and human sexuality progressed in intellectual circles.

The French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic conquests had a dramatic effect on European legal systems. Wherever Napoleon conquered, he established the Napoleonic legal code, a code that eliminated laws punishing people for non-commercial, adult, private, consensual sex acts. By the late 19th century, almost every major country in Europe had eliminated such laws.

Most prosecution for sodomy on the European continent was over, save for its sudden resurgence in Nazi Germany. Hitler's regime convicted between 50,000 and 63,000 men of sodomy charges; up to 15,000 were killed in death camps.6 Shockingly, jurists of the American and English liberators ruled that death camps were not, legally, prisons. Some homosexuals who had been sentenced to prison and later liberated from death camps were actually sent to prisons by these jurists to serve their terms.7

A less savage exception to European tolerance was Britain. England was never conquered by Napoleon, and its laws continued to punish sodomy. Its death-by-being-buried-alive penalty, dating back to the 1500s, wasn't fully eliminated until 1861. The British aristocracy feared that a weakening of strict moral standards had paved the way for the French Revolution. They established the Society for the Suppression of Vice in 1802 and began a wide-scale, puritanical campaign to block liberalization of laws against certain sexual acts.8

It took 1,700 years of wars, inquisitions, and reformations before the Christian world would discover that Christianity is not dependent upon the state, nor is it diminished by its separation from the coercive power of the state.

The best-known English prosecution occurred in 1895 when the government of England charged Oscar Wilde with gross indecency between males. Wilde was a celebrity and one of England's best-known authors and playwrights. After two trials, he was convicted and sentenced to two years of hard labor in prison. Not until 1967 were consensual, adult, same-sex acts largely legalized in Britain.

Living in America

The Enlightenment and the history of religious wars in Europe shaped the ideas of America's founders. The new American Constitution established that there would be no official government religion in the United States. It had taken 1,776 years and millions of lives lost to wars before we finally accepted the wisdom of Jesus Christ.

While the notion of separate church and government authorities was accepted in America, many laws serving no civil function, and that were strictly moral or religious in their purpose and origins, remained on the books. As our nation has evolved, most Christians have grown confident that their faith will endure and flourish without being subsidized by government force. In 1962 Illinois became the first U.S. state to repeal its sodomy law. Today, 27 states have done so and courts have invalidated laws in another ten. Most observers of the Supreme Court believe it is likely that the Court will find remaining sodomy laws, like Michigan's, unconstitutional.

Thank God Jesus Never Ran for Office

So what about those "stan" countries and other Islamic nations? Why has the rest of the world decriminalized private, consensual, non-commercial sexual acts while a few Islamic-majority nations retain and brutally enforce such laws?

The answer lies in the fact that Mohammed actually acquired political power and operated a government, while Jesus showed no interest in politics whatsoever. Mohammed led armies, levied taxes, and created a well-disciplined state with a system of law. Many of those laws were quite specific on subjects that Jesus only addressed in a broad, philosophical sense. Jesus, for example, preached charity for the poor, but Mohammed actually wrote budgets that appropriated state revenue for the poor.9

Mohammed's legal code is fairly detailed, right down to how to greet strangers and how many provisions one must provide traveling guests at the end of a visit. Some of Mohammed's citations seem to prohibit speculating in the stock market: "If anyone keeps goods till the price rises, he is a sinner." There are prohibitions against drinking while standing up and against eating with your left hand.

Mohammed laid down the law about sexual activity as severely as Moses did in Leviticus: 100 lashes for general fornication, and death to sodomites. While Jesus could trump Leviticus with his New Testament, Mohammed is the final prophet in Islam.

So are Islamic countries' laws stuck forever in time, while Christian and other nations innovate, liberate, and advance? Can a modern understanding of liberty become reality in the Middle East? People of the Islamic faith must answer those questions and make those choices.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Supreme Court and the handful of states with laws based less on logic than on Leviticus must also make a choice. Keep the laws on the books for "symbolic reasons," really enforce them, or repeal them and render unto Caesar only that which is Caesar's.

Countries or U.S. States with sodomy laws punishable
by 15 years or more of imprisonment, or by death:
Afghanistan: DeathMichigan: 15 years in prison
Bangladesh: Life in prisonNepal: Life in prison
Bhutan: Life in prisonNigeria: Death
Guyana: Life in prisonPakistan: Death
Idaho: Life in prisonPuerto Rico: 20 years in prison
India: Life in prisonSaudi Arabia: Death
Iran: DeathSingapore: Life in prison
Maldives: Life in prisonSudan: Death
Malaysia: 20 years/caningUnited Arab Emirates: Death
Mauritania: DeathYemen: Death



1  Reuters News Agency, July 11, 2000.

BACK



2  John Boswell, "Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality," p. 295, University of Chicago Press, 1980.

BACK



3  Michael Rocke, "Forbidden Friendships: Homosexuality and Male Culture in Renaissance Florence," p. 199, Oxford University Press, 1998.

BACK



4  Serge Bramly, "Leonardo: The Artist and the Man," pp. 117–119, Penguin Books Ltd., 1988.

BACK



5  Rocke, pp. 228–229.

BACK



6  Richard Plant, "The Pink Triangle," pp. 149, 154, Henry Holt and Company, Inc., 1986.

BACK



7  Plant, p. 181.

BACK



8  Roy Porter, "The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment," pp. 294, xxi, W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 2000. Also, David F. Greenburg, People Weekly, July 21, 1986.

BACK



9  Muhammed Hamidullah, Introduction to Islam, section 42, Centre Cultural Islamique, Paris, 1969.

BACK

© Copyright 2008, Liberty Foundation


Send editorial comments to letters@libertyunbound.com.
All letters to the editor are assumed to be for publication unless otherwise indicated.

Send web site comments to webmaster@libertyunbound.com.


Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search