|
|
Logan Brandt
sojourns among the Free State Project's vanguard. Manifesto Reclaiming the American Frontier by Tim Condon It's
time for a new generation of pioneers to claim their heritage as free people.
Americans, remember your history! If you love liberty, if
you see our traditional freedoms being whittled away, join us in the Free State!
Think of where we came from, both as a people and a country. There is a crisis
coming. We Americans are on the verge of losing something historical, something
precious, something real.
| | Tim
Condon is an attorney in Tampa, Fla., a Marine Corps veteran, and the
director of member services for the Free State Project.
|
|
More than 100 years ago a University of Wisconsin history professor presented
a paper at a meeting of the American Historical Society in Chicago. The monograph
presented a new and controversial theory of American development which sparked a
debate that continues to this day. The paper: "The Significance of the Frontier
in American History" by Frederick Jackson Turner. The theory: Americans are
fundamentally different from their European forebears; they are a new and special
people, molded by the American frontier experience.
The fulcrum of Professor Turner's thesis was the availability of inexpensive
or free land for all. Never in modern history, he noted, had a people had access
to "land for the taking." The frontier experience of abundant land, he argued,
had made Americans independent, restless, individualistic, inventive, exuberant;
the first "authentically free" people. If the frontier experience, with land for
the taking at its center, had somehow made Americans into a new and different
people, reasoned Turner, then the end of the American frontier announced
by the office of the U.S. Census in 1890 was occasion for pause and
consideration, if not outright alarm.
In placing land at the center of his theory, however, Turner made a crucial
mistake. His observation that the New World had produced an exceptional and
unusual people with their bravery, their hard-nosed practicality, their
vivacity, and their disdain for class distinctions was accurate, but his
assertion that the American frontier itself "created" this new American was
inaccurate. Rather, the American frontier had empowered such people, where before
they had been powerless, marginalized, and ignored in the still-feudal precincts
of the Old World.
|
| In light of Frederick
Jackson Turner's thesis, the question then is not "What happens when the frontier
closes?" but rather what can endanger and threaten the liberties that the new
Americans created for themselves. |
|
Eric Hoffer, the "longshoreman philosopher" who penned "The True Believer,"
wrote that: "This vast continent with its towns, farms, factories, dams,
aqueducts, docks, railroads, highways, powerhouses, schools, and parks is the
product of the common folk from the Old World, where for centuries men of their
kind had been beasts of burden, the property of their masters kings,
nobles, and priests and with no will and no aspirations of their own. . .
. Only here, in America, were the common folk of the Old World given a chance to
show what they could do on their own, without a master to push and order them
about. History contrived an earth-shaking joke when it lifted by the nape of the
neck lowly peasants, shopkeepers, laborers, paupers, jailbirds, and drunks from
the midst of Europe, dumped them on a vast, virgin continent and said: "Go to it;
it is yours!" And the lowly were not awed by the magnitude of the task. A hunger
for action, pent up for centuries, found an outlet. They went into it with ax,
pick, shovel, plow, and rifle; on foot, on horse, in wagons, and on flatboats.
They went into it praying, howling, singing, brawling, drinking, and
fighting."
Thus, it wasn't the frontier that had created a radically new kind of people,
as Professor Turner asserted. The new Americans a rigorously selected
subset of the European population were already extraordinary. Karl Hess, a
libertarian luminary who wrote prolifically and passionately about individual
freedom, was once asked what he thought had made America so spectacularly
successful as a nation. "That's easy," he replied. "We got the best people."
Does this mean that Americans are unique in the annals of human history? Not
at all. In fact, wherever governments smother a people and destroy their right to
live peaceably as they see fit, any alternative will be seized upon, even if it
is dangerous, difficult, and fraught with chance. Who is willing to risk that?
Only those who can't "get with the program." The misfits, nonconformists, and
rule-breakers who refuse to accommodate themselves to injustice and tyranny. The
20th century alone is rife with examples. Cubans fled Castro's communist
dictatorship for Miami, in the process turning all of south Florida into an
international multicultural metropolis. The Chinese who fled communist China
landed on a few square miles of rocky coastline of few natural resources; by the
1970s they had made Hong Kong's economy one of the largest in the world. And then
there was Vietnam. As George Gilder explained, in the wake of the war in Vietnam
"The United States won the only valuable remaining resource of Indochina: the
boat people. All the land and slaves they left behind are next to worthless."
| Karl Hess, a libertarian
luminary, was once asked what he thought had made America so spectacularly
successful as a nation. "That's easy," he replied. "We got the best people."
|
|
In light of Frederick Jackson Turner's thesis, the question then is not "What
happens when the frontier closes?" but rather what can endanger and threaten the
liberties that the new Americans created for themselves and us. The answer comes
from Thomas Jefferson, who warned, "The natural order of things is for liberty to
yield and government to gain ground." Governments, more than any other
institution in history, have been the handmaidens of oppression, war, slavery,
injustice, and inequality. Periods of relative freedom in history, with their
associated peace and prosperity, are rare exceptions to rule by governments run
amok. George Washington warned similarly, "Government is not reason; it is not
eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful
master."
In light of these warnings, let us examine the condition of America today. We
Americans are in the process of losing many of our long-held freedoms and
God-given rights. The frontier that lives on in our hearts is increasingly being
strangled by ever-expanding government.
Paul Craig Roberts of the Hoover Institution former associate editor
of The Wall Street Journal and former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury
wrote this in early 2004: "The protective principles in law that ensure
our civil liberties no crime without intent, no bills of attainder, no
retroactive law, the attorney-client privilege, no self-incrimination have
been eroded beyond recognition. Wars against the Mafia, drug dealers, child
abusers, and terrorists accused whose convictions are thought necessary at
all costs have eviscerated the Bill of Rights. Today not even
multi-billionaires can fight off prosecutorial frame-ups."
Thomas G. West, professor of politics at the University of Dallas, observed
also in early 2004 that, "America has less freedom of speech today than it has
ever had in its history." As just one of several examples, Prof. West noted that
the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (the McCain-Feingold bill) placed
"substantial limits on the right of political parties and nonprofit organizations
to publicize their views on candidates during election campaigns." Furthermore,
in December 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law and "saw no conflict with
the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech and of the press. Yet it is
impossible to imagine a more obvious violation of the First Amendment."
Our constitutional freedoms are today under very serious and widespread
assault, possibly more so than at any other time in our history. The Free State
Project is an effort to meet and reverse this degenerating situation. Despite the
fact that the frontier spirit of individualism and freedom now resides only in
our hearts, there is still value in having a geographic home for those who value
the Constitution and freedom above all else. The Free State Project is creating
that new home, a place for today's "misfits and non-conformers" who refuse to
accept the attenuation of heretofore untouchable American individual rights.
A single low-population state was chosen by a vote of the Free State Project
membership and announced to the world on Oct. 1, 2003. This state, New Hampshire,
is blessed with great beauty, a strong economy, and a population already disposed
toward low taxes, small government, and individual freedom. For those who uphold
the system of constitutional federalism bequeathed to us by the Founding Fathers,
for those who would resist the further encroachments of an ever-expanding federal
government, the Free State is our natural home. We are creating an authentically
and traditionally free geographic entity in the midst of an increasingly unfree
polity. We will demonstrate to the world the benefits of small government, low
taxes, privatization, decentralization, and individual rights that may not be
transgressed.
The Free State Project is the reopening of the American frontier. The
migration is already beginning.
Join us.
|
| | |
|