Liberty

Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  |  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search


January 2006
Volume 20,
Number 3

The Legend of Zorro, directed by Martin Campbell. Amblin Entertainment, 2005, 129 minutes.


Zzzorro

by Jo Ann Skousen

Start with a legendary classic: Zorro. Add an Oscar-winning actress (Catherine Zeta-Jones) and a Latin Romeo known for his wry humor (Antonio Banderas). Top with a legendary executive producer (Steven Spielberg). Mix with four scriptwriters. And what do you get? A perfect example of what has gone wrong with movies this year. Z is for zzzzzzz.

Jo Ann Skousen is a writer and critic living in New York.

With four writers, it's no wonder "The Legend of Zorro" is a mess. Stories — good stories at least — cannot be written by committee. A story needs a compelling conflict, and characters need believable motivations. That can't happen when four people are throwing their two cents into the pot and trying to compromise on the result. This movie feels like a sequel pushed by the producers to capitalize on the success of the original, but without any enthusiasm from the original crew. The actors seem to be thinking more about their next meal than their next line. Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio, who wrote the original "Mask of Zorro," are credited with the story, but two newcomers, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, joined the committee to write the screenplay for this sequel. Their previous credits include such notable projects as "Hercules: Legendary Journeys" and "Xena: Warrior Prin-cess." It shows.

I don't mind suspending my disbelief in order to enjoy an action-adventure flick; in fact, I look forward to heroes leaping across housetops, somersaulting onto waiting horses, and brandishing swords with lightning speed. But this movie is just shockingly awful. The anachronisms alone are a hoot. Mom and Dad take turns walking junior to school and picking him up afterwards. Elena asks for and receives a quickie divorce — in Catholic California. Over dinner, Elena asks her date where she might find the bathroom to powder her cheeks. A bathroom? This is 1850. It's out back, over a hole in the ground, for heaven's sakes! The movie even presents a clean-shaven Abraham Lincoln signing California's statehood papers — but Lincoln wouldn't become president till 1861; it was Millard Fillmore's pen that brought California into the Union.

With movies costing many millions of dollars to produce and many more to promote, studios this year seem afraid to try anything new. This season has been fraught with sequels, remakes, and TV shows turned into movies. Occasionally an outstanding performance can save a remake — Johnny Depp was brilliant as Willy Wonka this summer — but great new stories are the only sure way to bring Hollywood out of its malaise. I once asked Ben Stein why Hollywood, one of the biggest business centers in the country, always makes business people the bad guys in movies. He suggested the reason is that screenwriters are the poorest paid members of the industry, and their writing reflects their own bias. Perhaps when studios start paying enough to lure great writers to the screen, they will get decent movies.

© Copyright 2008, Liberty Foundation


Send editorial comments to letters@libertyunbound.com.
All letters to the editor are assumed to be for publication unless otherwise indicated.

Send web site comments to webmaster@libertyunbound.com.


Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Subscription Services  Liberty Store  |  Writers' Guide  |  Editors & Staff  |  Search